Uncomfortable potential truths./ Change coming?

Well, my strange sexual interest over the past few days has subsided with my diabetes being under better control. I also realised that I was not aware of the copyright law, and had screenshotted peoples photos and taken photos from the internet. I am not fully sure of the copyright laws and I don't think anyone is, however, if things do suddenly transform in a more positive direction, a large number of people will go straight to David Wilcock -> Ll research -> here and if I have more positive attention I may also get people that want to snuff that out so it would be good not to give them easy targets!

Also, my audience is rising. Not a massive amount but it is definitely going up. The higher I get the more I will have to pay attention to such concerns... If I theoretically had five readers per article; I could pretty much get away with anything!

Things will never be the same again:

How strong is our commitment to truth, and to reason and evidence if that is decided to be the best way to discern it? (Occasionally I get an idea of how to argue against reason and evidence being the best method, many of my most important insights have been purely intuition and later found out to be correct. It would offer an interesting opposition to Stefan Molyneux... In good faith!)

Well, in this case, my decision over a long time has thought about who to trust and for what reason. I trust David Wilcock because intuition lead me to him in a very strong way. I have resonated fully with his information. I understand and agree with his science. I also from what he talks about believe that he tells the truth and is reasonably honest on his commitment to his spiritual path! I believe he genuinely believes he cannot do bad things because karma will get him.

Thus I have a spring board under which to evaluate further information. For instance, the Law of One that I also intuitively resonated with strongly and intuitively understand, says certain things about the way the world works and I can use those understandings to increase my understanding of other conspiracy related subjects.

David Wilcock will back certain other people. So he backs Benjamin Fulford, he backs Corey Good and William Thompkins. Benjamin Fulford comes out with a lot of strange things, some of which are proven to be likely not true or opposed by other researchers. However, I do not think something Benjamin Fulford says that he has witnessed and experienced is a lie! That information is not of the same order as that which he gets second hand. So the information he gave about a black malevolent entity that was challenged by a positive spirit and disappeared through the Norway Spiral is very likely correct. It also makes sense from my understanding of spirits etc. and it's effect on everyone else.

David Icke I trust because you can see and feel where his information is but mostly, because what he says he has backed up with good research. On the "reason and evidence" idea David Icke is doing well, despite how that would sound counter intuitive from a mainstream perspective. When David Icke says he has met multiple people that have seen something and that he backs up with research related to ancient cultures and myths, I tend to think there is a good possibility he is correct.

So here are two videos:

The important point here is that he says at 1:30 that he has talked to many people that have witnessed this. David Icke has talked about this a few times and has other videos on this.

Next one:

The impact of this information has left me with a very uncomfortable feeling but the arguments against it are weak. David Wilcock was very much against this theory saying that physical matter does not work like that. He has nothing scientific to back it up (Pisces that he is). However, two things then happen that David does not comment on: Corey's peer Gonzales gains access to information that the Alliance caught a Reptilian and opened it up and they found out it was an AI. Obviously a very sophisticated one.

Corey also states that there was a human that was also a Reptilian. David asked him about this and Corey says 'it was probably a hybrid' (which is what David Icke is arguing, that Reptilians mated with humans to create a bloodline, and that this is why the royals keep to mating with their own family).

In this video, at 13 minutes...   

Alex and Dolly talk about Obama and Hillary smelling very bad. Like a dead pig or 'Sulfer' (Reptilian?)

Stillness in the Storm: "Benjamin Fulford March 30th 2015: Proposal for world federation has now been passed on to key power centers

The Japanese Yakuza once told me they killed George Bush Sr. and he was replaced by a clone. I heard something similar from the British. I also heard that North Korea’s Kim Jong Il was replaced by a clone. There is no need to invoke the supernatural or unknown science to explain how this could be possible. It would simply be a matter of finding several identical people and grooming them to act like a leader during public events. The real leaders could then write the “acting presidents’” scripts from behind the scenes without fear of assassination

So, there we have it! I still don't have a strong commitment but in my opinion, the evidence leans in favour of reptilians!

Also, Germany has basically been given over to the globalists by the sound of it:

This is in the run up to the election. Merkel is hoping people are too afraid to express support for non liberal policies so they do not vote for them. I wonder what the Chinese will have to say about that or if this is indeed accurate information:

Conspire Planet Blogspot: "Ben Fulford says "Khazarian Mafia Defeat Certain" Khazarian mafia defeat certain as rebellion spreads in the EU the US and elsewhere

Pentagon sources are saying that German Chancellor Angela Merkel (a member of the Saxe Gotha Rothschild family) already reached a deal with the Chinese when she visited China on June 13th. According to that deal Merkel promised to resign after Greece exits the EU and, in exchange, the Chinese agreed to rescue Deutschebank. Deutschebank would not otherwise survive a Greek exit from the EU (71% of Greeks are against the EU and only 27% support it) because it would mean a default on Greek debt which has been used by Deutschebank (and others) to create derivative mountains. These mountains would collapse once the sand of Greek debt they are built on is removed

The change'a coming!

Normally, when I think of political events there is a point in the future I am looking forward to where some change is likely to happen, a referendum or something like that.

Now, there is no hint of change in the real world although there is very powerful information regarding astrology... As I've mentioned often. More mystical signs.